Lessons not learnt: The Left and Right have distorted KPS Gill’s success against terrorism

Everything I write about KPS Gill can not be unbiased. There is a story from the time the partition was said often. Living in Lahore as fears of violence grew, his mother handed him a sword and accused him of killing his sister before taking any possible attacker. Fortunately, she never had the opportunity to exercise this sword of this child, my mother.

He often told this story not only as an anecdote but as an expression of one of his fundamental beliefs that the illusion of order we take for granted in society is only a few events or moments of destructive chaos.

The use of an anecdote to illustrate a larger point, which always leaves the listener to draw, was typical of his thought. This is also why it was so misunderstood by those who can not think for themselves, whether left or right liberal.

This is not where I describe my personal debt, which is substantial – my passion for science and failure and for the love of literature. It was there that I mean not only left liberals have made a gesture of their understanding of what happened in the Punjab, but the right of golfers who make the model as against the insurgency also have very little idea of what they are talking about.

There is only one thing at a time that left-wing and right-wing followers seem to agree that the brutal Gill approach was the one that worked in the Punjab. These liberals falsely acknowledge that keeping the police on their own can fight terrorism, which should always be based on a genuine wrong, I prefer to describe the success of Gill claiming that terror in the Punjab had lost public support.

Right-wingers attribute Gill’s success to full measure of his “brutal approach” and consider a claim at his request for brutal measures against the police or insurgency to deal with armed opponents of the Indian state.

I have used homicide figures for every month in all categories during the years of terrorism in Punjab (militancy is a conic description) to assess the impact of Gill as head of the Punjab police. If control of liability and credit should be considered, they should be considered in the overall state situation, and not in isolated or anecdotal cases of incidents.

The table clearly shows that Gill’s tenure as DGP saw a general decline in homicides during the tenure of his predecessor and his successor. His predecessor was former Julio Ribeiro, who is constantly quoted by the Liberals because he speaks against Modi today without regard to the fact that, within his mandate, the police lost control as the violence in state showed, so Gill Was to take over.

Gill took the first post of general manager of the Punjab police in May 1988, just before Black Thunder II, the operation carried out under the command and control of gills which unlike the disastrous The blue star, saw the security forces expel the terrorists from the golden temple, without entering the premises. By the end of 1989, terror in the Punjab had been strangled with a narrow part of the state. In his final article in the Punjab, Gill wrote:

“About 76 percent of all terrorist incidents in 1989 are stored in four police districts along the border (a total of 15 police districts in the state) … In the fourth quarter of 1989, only 13 police stations (a total of 217 statewide) accounted for almost 65 percent of all terrorist offenses (and 64 percent of all civilian deaths) … I was then, and I am still Absolutely convinced that terrorism could have been eliminated at that time … in another six months. “

Leave a Comment